General Discussion

If there is anything you want to talk about that doesn't relate to the rest of the game, please put it here.

Hello again Squadfather and Gene. Nice to see y'all once more.

Hello as well, it's good to be in the same group again.

So just found this, and the singer's voice made me want to share it:

Seriously this guy's voice is like if you took Christopher Lee's and lowered/deepened it! It's awesome!!!

EDIT: Since GP won't let me embed the video, here's a link

Things have gone pretty silent around here.

I know that Squadfather and I are working on finishing up the tie-ins between our characters and were going to submit soon. We're waiting on some information from the DM.

Sorry everyone. I had a sudden conference at work and I won't be back until Monday. Sorry yall.

Understood, I'm getting the framework for the IC start done tonight, and will get the actual start of the campaign Monday morning.

Having cleared it with Squad & Raddue, here's the basic layout for the campaign start:

The above two have been captured by Jahred & Faerin for the theft of a noble family's genealogy tome (magical item that self-updates when members die or are born), and are traveling alongside a merchant caravan through a wooded area that has had reports of bandit attacks. Among the hired guards, is the centaur scout Wahuhi. From there...

I would rather not start this way. It sounds like a great setup for a book, but not for a D&D party, especially with people I've never played with before. If there is a way to begin without players being directly opposed to each other, I'd rather start that way than with half the party the prisoner of the other half. There's just too many ways for that to go south.

Fair enough, I have another hook that I was originally going to use and this had seemed like an easy tie in with the backstories provided.

I understand, and I hope my reaction wasn't too strong.

I must agree with DMDoom. Starting with situation that has party members against other party members is only bound to lead to interparty conflict and generally a lesser game. Very contrary to party unity.

I brought up that issue, but I let Meribson know that as long as something happened where the other players were sympathetic or something that it could work out. I was willing to roll with it, but I'm also willing to have another start since others seem worried about it. :)

Yeah. It would require us to be STATED sympathetic so as not to be opposed to the rogue's previous action. So as not to cause a break in party unity. Then the previous start would work. That of course is dumping a forced issue on each party member to accept.

Absolutely agree.

I'm looking forward to starting the game. I'm fine with starting the game with either way.

Adventure 1 - Delving into Godsskull is live!

Do we already know each other?