Oct 26, 2019 11:29 pm
They are two different things.
I'm not calling anyone in particular out, but I have observed on other boards that sometimes GMs will restrict players to those who have not read or played the adventure in question. Well, that leaves me out. As a GM of 40 years, there isn't much that I haven't read/played. But, I can separate player knowledge and character knowledge. I have no problem playing dumb. So please, don't overlook the potential that I might be able to add to a game just because I've read the adventure, and I would assume that most players can separate what the character knows from what the player knows.
I'm not calling anyone in particular out, but I have observed on other boards that sometimes GMs will restrict players to those who have not read or played the adventure in question. Well, that leaves me out. As a GM of 40 years, there isn't much that I haven't read/played. But, I can separate player knowledge and character knowledge. I have no problem playing dumb. So please, don't overlook the potential that I might be able to add to a game just because I've read the adventure, and I would assume that most players can separate what the character knows from what the player knows.