Aug 23, 2016 8:45 pm
Just spitballing but maybe he tomb is actually built in a way that accentuates the flood land? The land was claimed for the temple because it was the best land available to architecturally feature the temple that ends up being a partially submerged structure during the floods and a beautiful silty beach in the dry season. Maybe an phenomenon occurred at the consecration of the temple that was directly prior to the floods not occurring. This leads the lay people in thinking that the temple is to blame and the priests are not sure (or maybe they are sure it's not and this is just a fools errand to ply the people into thinking something is being done.) I don't know. I'm open to other ideas.