Superhero game

I ran a game of Fate for a super hero game and it went really well. The aspects are so open that you can essentially make any power set you want. The only issue is that there's little to no progression in Fate for the most part, but it can still feel like you're progressing with story and character RP cues.

I'm willing to jump into Fate or M&M.

This is off the original topic, but I'm not entirely sure that's true. Marvel owns the copyright to material and would have licensed it to TSR. Its true that TSR no longer exists, but all of the Marvel content is still under copyright, and Wizards of the Coast owns all of TSR's IP. Copyright protection takes longer than 20 years to lapse if no one renews to license. What I wonder about is that the game is longer produced, supported, or distributed in any capacity.

Needless to say, there are options for superhero games. I think Catalyst even put out one based on the Valiant Comic Book universe.

While I don't mind crunch, I know it can bog things down. I'd like to play a system that allowed for a more cinematic feel to gameplay. Thanks for all the suggestions. It's a lot to learn.

It's been a long time since I've played a supers game, and would love to play one. I know people say that game systems encourage or discourage certain types of rp, but I honestly think it always ultimately will be a function of what the players and the GM want out of a game - so the answer to what's the best rpg for x type of game really depends on what style of mechanics you're in the mood for.

I've only played M&M2e, but 3e seems solid. If you want something crunchy and simulationist, it's your system. I really liked it's saving throw alternative to hp, and the gamer side of me loves spending piles of points and figuring out how to build powers.

Fate wise, I haven't looked at Venture City, but I love Atomic Robo. It would be a good system for playing loose and fast with powers, not really outlining the limitations but rather giving guidelines on intent. I love how aspects work and how non-combatants can contribute to combat using skills to make aspects, but it can be hard to honor everybody's aspects because it can be a lot for the GM to keep track of. And the benny/adventure point economy makes or breaks the game, so if remembering to hand them out isn't a strong suit, I'd suggest dabbling before committing.

I LOVE Marvel Heroic. I love that low powered characters are balanced against high power characters by the in game mechanics, not by balancing characters. I love how fiddly putting together dice pools is, and how gamey allocating the dice is. I love that the currency is narrative control, not power of individuals. HOWEVER, making characters is very seat of your pants, and many people seem to resent the lack of granularity (I don'the care that Thing and Hulk have equal story authority- Hulk should have a higher strength! Etc.). Humans get d6's, heroes run from d8 - d12, only 3 grades of difference. Also, the xp system... takes some getting used to. If you're into it, if suggest looking at Firefly to guide char gen and advancement, as it is a refinement of the system.

Last, I've been dying to play Masks. Dying! It just seems so damn cool! But in a way, powers are secondary. The game really focuses on social dynamics, and groups who have influence over each other. I think it could easily be hacked to not focus on young adults, but the influence thing is hard-coded into the game. You have to want superhero soap opera. But if you're cool with that, that is definitely the system that attracts me the most right now.

My $0.02, anyway.

I played Champions back in the day. Picked up M&M 3e off of AMZN because it gave me another rule system to investigate. Definitely some components of it that are interesting and likable.

Notably, Champions has an edition as late as 2010. Not sure how the Hero System differs from 1e, though.

I forgot about Champions and Hero. I like Hero, which in gameplay is super simple and very trad. The char gen is a lot like M&M3e (effects based power building - though it's probably more fair to say M&M3e is like Hero, given Hero is way older) but MUCH mathier. I wouldn't do it without the char gen program, which I haven't looked at since the Fred (5th Edition, revised). I'm assuming 6e has one, because you start getting silly stuff, like fractional multipliers to cost.

Champions I thought was the setting for Hero, then split of into its own game. Or maybe vice versa. I have little experience with it. The last edition I played was probably late 90s/early 00s, using a system called Fusion (Fuzion?) And it was... exceptionally mediocre. Check it out, make up your own mind, but for my money, I'd pick any of the others over that version.

On Champions, some random browsing of the internets seems to suggest that 4th edition may be the one to stick with, if you have the ability to get it. Apparently 5th and 6th got a little bloated and more complicated whereas 2nd, 3rd and 4th were tightening up the game that was originally released in 1e in 1981.

If you get a super hero game running at some point in the future, I would definitely check it out!

I don't think I'm going to be the one running this game anytime soon. I'm currently running one game, playing in three, work a full-time job, and a part-time student.
My dance card is kinda full.

I've always wanted to try Marvel Heroic, but my one attempt at running a super hero RPG (M&M 1e) for my face to face group left me realizing that they don't know the genre at all and still played it in murderhobos looking for loot mode so I've never tried to replicate in another system :P

I have played with the idea of running a Marvel Heroic rpg online. But since I've never run in before it would have to be the Breakout mini event first and see where it goes from there. If there's interest I could start reading up on the rules again early next week and probably have a game ready the week after :)

Lmao superman murdering a homeless person and checking the pockets. That's hilarious

Yeah, some players simply can't get out of a DnD mindset...

I would argue the percieved dnd mindset. I personally do not play dnd that way nor do I believe that was the intention. I believe that is a video game mindset where programming limits realistic reactions and consequences. Also in video games realism usually takes a back seat to gameplay.

Add to the fact that I was the only one in our group who read superhero comics and got the tropes. This was also in 2004 so the superhero movie craze was a few years off.

I dunno, my friends and I have played plenty of story driven D&D, but we've been saying, "Let's Greyhawk the bodies," since the 80s....

Which, off topic, Stranger Things - that was my friends and I: the ages, the outsider status, the weird dynamics with older siblings, the BMX bikes, all of it. Loved it. My wife just shook her head when I said, "It's awesome that they're portraying D&D, but that's not how you'd actually fight Demogorgon..."
I ran Silver Age Sentinels for my friends for a while, and realized the same thing. All my comix knowledge was weird stuff, and I knew nothing about how to put together an actual story line that was more than a super golden age, "Quick, Murderizer and the Flying O are robbing the jewelry store!" My friends liked it, but I was super uncomfortable because I felt I was bringing the wrong tropes to the party.

That said, you run MHRP, I'm there in a heartbeat. Also Exalted, because that's just anime superheroes of mythic pan-Asia. Which, come to think of it, I believe I saw a neat MHRP hack for running Exalted somewhere....

Anybody actually planning to run one of these? If so, count me in?

Same here.

I would like to, have made a dedicated thread here.