htech says:
Hey everyone, GM here — just wanted to pause for a quick check-in. I want to be super clear that I, as the GM, don’t personally agree with Greta’s views or her philosophy. But, alas, I have a story to tell and a character to paint, and Greta’s worldview — for better or worse — is part of that story. There’s every chance she’s on a path toward becoming a villain, or at least an antagonist.
All is cool with how you play Greta. I merely was in an unfortunate situation where I can either let her final implication remain voiced unopposed despite Zix disagreeing strongly, or oppose it verbally (but then being forced to point out
what the issue with the implication is). So I went for the latter, and apologise if that was too grim, and may be non-enjoyable to other players.
htech says:
That said, I care a lot about how you, the players (not the PCs), are feeling right now. Is everyone comfortable continuing? Would you like to fade to black and move forward? Or does anyone want to raise an X card if this conversation is hitting too close to home? No judgment either way — we’re here to have fun, not to stress anyone out. Let me know!
I'm fine and eager to continue playing this scene and see where it heads. I would probably be a bit more confident (less nervous) about doing so after knowing if anyone has concerns about my RP of Zix in this dialogue (and future ones). I do have a response in mind that will now also address the rest of her stance, though it'll take a while to type it (once I get more free time to do it).
Also, I'm trying to not gloss over the nuance in Greta's stance, and if we continue, will try to make that clearer.
-----
A thing about the process of steering away from unenjoyable events if the card gets invoked now or in the future: if possible and reasonable to request this, I would rather have such course changes be done forwards and not backwards (i.e. steer away from an action/event/topic, but avoid retcons or everyone pretending a thing didn't happen); if you'd like, I can elaborate and spell out the reasoning.