GreyWord says:
talking of 6 second rounds. Please don't treat this as criticism. But I challenge you to quote aloud
"In the name of Brightest of the all Lightnings... that is always hidden in the very center of the Greatest Storm... I COMMAND YOU... BOW before... and RUN from... the purest FORCE!"
In the tone you intended and proper stops where ... stated. How much time would this take for you? For my brain to not blow up I'll assume either PC continue this through the next round or two or perhaps that was what PC intended to say but we only hear a part of it.
P.S. I will not limit your talking as a DM. As a play I recommend to imagine yourself in your PC shoes wearing the heaver armor, variety of weapons and trying to block enemy blades during the combat. You may discover new level of game play experience
Hmmm... ! That is interesting on many levels! But I will try keep it short - so please remember that I'm still new to 5e and try to figure out "what kind of game those rules encourage and how do people play it" - so as I usually use sentences in "claiming mode"(somehow it's my nature - to challenge people to not agree with some of my claims - if they think so :) - I'm fully aware that I may be very wrong in many places:)
1. So you think/see 5e combat as very "realistic"?? It's surprising for me... As so far I have seen/perceived it as very abstract/boardgame'y combat rules? Where people think more about what abilities/powers to use from their PC sheets, rather then how it will look and what will be an effect in fiction(apart from chopping some HP)? So I have seen my (probably poor) attempts to RP my combat actions as quite separate from the combat rules. Like narration is only for flavor...
Don't get me wrong I love abstract games and have probably
much to many boardgames(most euro) + like me same skirmish games, so generally it's nothing wrong to me and probably it is one of those reasons why DnD 5ed is so popular - players don't "have to" RP too much, at least in combat + they can tinker with their PC stats and powers to their hearts content:)
But generally from RPGs I expect something different... more visual, more in imagination, more free-form, in-book-like with much more granular interaction with the in fiction world:) Probably it's the reason I will stick with OSR-style in the future.
So: you see 5e combat as very "realistic" and good for making it inline with PC actions in fiction? Good for RPing it ? That would be very interesting as I didn't see that too much in games I have read here on GP so far? (I have not IRL experiences with 5e). If the answer is: yes -> I'm willing to reconsider my view on this subject.
It's also not a criticism in any way, just want to establish what is expected from me in 5e game - and adjust to that. At least for the duration of this game:)
2. You are completely right - no way to say it in proper way in 6 seconds! :) So for this instance I see it as: Zean started his "invocation" in this particular round - the powers started to take effect on undead, because the power is more about force of will and faith of Zean, rather than the words alone. The words only seal the power that was invoked by Zean dedication and he was continuing to say them during the next round. As far as I know saying something is incidental/free action - so they shouldn't have impact on Zean drawing his maul and attacking the undead in the same time? And to make it more logical - there was not a singel flash from Zean's focus( Eye of the storm) but few separated by exactly 1 second each - like making a rentgen photos, but with lightening flash:) And they left the stronger mark with each flash on the under guards.
3. Thanks for all your comments and sharing your perspective - I like to learn how people see their games and systems:)
Last edited April 25, 2024 8:21 am