OOC

Feb 13, 2018 8:47 am
A side OOC thread to help pass time in between posts as well as to ask questions about the game!


What's everyone been watching lately? I started watching altered carbon on Netflix and man what a good show it's been so far.
Feb 13, 2018 12:48 pm
Altered Carbon is unbelievably good. Great production value, set design, costume design and CGI.

The acting and plot are high quality.

Plus I love anything with a healthy mix of cyberpunk and dystopian.
Feb 13, 2018 12:55 pm
Wife and I just finished up Punisher...thought it was fabulous. Great depiction of Frank Castle
Feb 13, 2018 10:17 pm
I have a bad habit of bouncing around to different shows. I'm almost caught up on all Supernatural and Punisher, still working on Arrow, Breaking Bad, Attack on Titan, and X-Files.
Feb 14, 2018 3:16 am
Jabberwocky says:
Altered Carbon is unbelievably good. Great production value, set design, costume design and CGI.

The acting and plot are high quality.

Plus I love anything with a healthy mix of cyberpunk and dystopian.
The plot keeps throwing me for loops. Just when I think I have it all figured out they find a way to tell me im completely wrong.

I should try punisher. Ive heard a couple people now say its pretty good
Feb 14, 2018 6:06 am
Sorry guys, I'm fairly new to DnD so am still getting my head around this. But I was thinking of chiming in the game thread with my character using his history prof and Book of Lore to school listeners on this topic, seems like a great RP opportunity for my character. However given I actually know little about Huester and the story how would this actually work? Do I bluff on a successful role or do I succeed in a role and the GM divulges on my characters behalf?
Feb 14, 2018 11:11 am
If the intent is to make your spiel believable it would be a competing check with the PCs that are in the tavern (would be a matter did you reach a target number if it was NPCs) with your deception competing against their insight.

And no need to be sorry! Everyone playing was new to dnd at some point or another!
Feb 14, 2018 11:30 am
Is Vortrin trying to fake it or does he actually know something? We all know that as players we know almost nothing but our characters might know more. Faking it is Deception vs. listeners' Insight as DM AWS has described. But if you're talking about Vortrin actually knowing something you as player don't then I would say a History roll but that's really the DM's call.

And yeah, don't worry about being a newbie! Like our DM says we were all newbies at some point. :-)
Feb 14, 2018 12:07 pm
OK thanks for the patience fellas.

So what I was thinking was him actually knowing history of the some of Huersta's tale. But I don't know how it works if I personally don't know the history. Vortrin being a professor of archaeology and something of a history buff to ply his trade it could come in useful here.

If there is a way for me to roll to of history and have the DM give the history would that work?
Feb 14, 2018 1:49 pm
You could roll history, and I'll give some information per the roll but it likely won't be much. Most characters in game don't know much about the place itself so even a history buff would have had a hard time getting info on the place

DMJ

Feb 14, 2018 2:08 pm
Right on, JW -- Roll that History, bro! Maybe you get something, even if not much. Anything you get would be new to us. If you get nothing, no harm in trying.
You say you are new, but you're about to serve up the FIRST ACTIVE ROLL of the game. Good Show!

J

DMJ

Feb 14, 2018 2:48 pm
Jabes.plays.RPG says:
... All his life Asterion has always been drawn to the stranger things.
NOOICE!

https://DL.dropbox.com/s/utlhh3kzpytovk0/stranger%20things.jpg
Feb 14, 2018 2:53 pm
Yeah Asterion is definitely inspired by Will Byers. As someone who grew up in the 80's riding bikes, being a nerd, and playing D&D I am so in love with that show!

https://i.pinimg.com/564x/d0/23/79/d02379a10c295918a328b667685a89aa.jpg

"I was born under a dark star. I can feel it watching me, coldly and distantly. Sometimes it beckons me in the dead of night."

Trait: I rarely talk about the thing that torments me. I’d rather not burden others with my curse.
Bond: There’s evil in me, I can feel it. It must never be set free.
Last edited February 14, 2018 2:56 pm

DMJ

Feb 14, 2018 3:13 pm
Yo, Jabes. Be careful. The way you are describing Asterion, I'm getting nervous that this might be him after a few game sesh episodes.

https://dl.dropbox.com/s/pl146h2qzoovbgh/will%20byers%20asterion.jpg
Last edited February 14, 2018 3:13 pm
Feb 14, 2018 3:24 pm
Well, who knows what AWS has in store for us? And as you pointed out, the Upside Down is the Land of Shadow from 1e AD&D, and now Land of Shadow is Shadowfell in modern times so we'll see if Asterion will finally come face to face with his patron.
Feb 14, 2018 9:16 pm
DMJ says:
Right on, JW -- Roll that History, bro! Maybe you get something, even if not much. Anything you get would be new to us. If you get nothing, no harm in trying.
You say you are new, but you're about to serve up the FIRST ACTIVE ROLL of the game. Good Show!

J
Thanks man, lets see what comes of it.
Feb 15, 2018 2:24 pm
Copying this over from the game thread and deleting the one in the game thread. In the future put long stuff like this in this thread so it doesnt bog down the roleplaying pages
OOC:
DM aws5000,
I have to respectfully, and very carefully, say that I think it is a very slippery slope to let skills checks start to override player agency.

Of course if there is magic, mind control, etc. - we understand that. Also if someone grapples you and throws you around by STR comparison, that's part of combat. Sometimes you are forced to do what you don't want.

But I think the realms of Intimidation, Persuasion, etc. are quite dangerous to be wielded as mechanisms to dictate player response and character mentality. In these sorts of things, I don't think a player's actions should be controlled by a skill check from an opponent, whether it is an NPC or a PC.

Extreme examples have their place to think about these things, not that they always happen, but they might illustrate the problem most obviously. What if a high level, high CHA Rogue took Expertise in Intimidation, say getting a +10 to Intimidation checks? He would certainly be a force to be reckoned with if he went around the party forcing everyone to cower and submit. Shit their pants even?! Whoa.

Maybe Stud and JW are seeing this as fun now, but I think it may be a careful moment because JW has said again and again how new he is on this. I would just say that if this is a trend and S.Stud wants to establish an option for using skill checks to demand specific responses from other PCs, I personally would not be happy having to submit to that if it came my way.

To sum it up then, I think it is at least a risky idea, to allow manipulation-related skill checks to be used on players.

So there is my 2 cents, only because you (I think) opened the door for it saying "if others are onboard."
But hey, man, again...I definitely want to approach you in the right manner. And I know there are other ways to look at this topic. I don't think it is a good habit to badger or argue with the DM, and definitely not in public. And I know the rules/mechanics are part of the game, but not the game itself. I really think this game is off to a great start and I appreciate all of your work on it - thanks for hearing me out.

Sincerely,
J
Feb 15, 2018 2:27 pm
To that I agree. I had stated in the post that we would only proceed that way should everyone be okay with it. Seeing as there are objections to this, I'm going to edit the post I made, and just requiring jabba to act in the manner he thinks his character would react in that situation.
Feb 15, 2018 3:18 pm
Personally I think only insight and physical skill checks should be performed between players.
Feb 15, 2018 8:52 pm
Hey guys,

Sorry if I've caused an issue and completely see the point here.

Would this also apply to npcs like our drunken dwarf?
load next

You do not have permission to post in this thread.