OOC Discussion

load previous
Aug 25, 2016 5:17 pm
Added the perception check to my post.

Oops yeah thanks for the reminder about the cumulative -5!
Aug 25, 2016 5:21 pm
Jabes.plays.RPG says:
Added the perception check to my post.

Oops yeah thanks for the reminder about the cumulative -5!
I think it's easier to forget with this Action Economy system, honestly
Aug 25, 2016 5:53 pm
JoHoover says:
Rolls
Intimidation Check - (1d20+4)
( 20 ) + 4 = 24
And that, ladies and gents, is how you intimidate someone...
Aug 25, 2016 7:24 pm
irvanovich says:
And that, ladies and gents, is how you intimidate someone...
If only it worked on more than 1 goblin...
Aug 25, 2016 7:25 pm
JoHoover says:
irvanovich says:
And that, ladies and gents, is how you intimidate someone...
If only it worked on more than 1 goblin...
Yeah, but that one goblin has it currently running down both legs.
Aug 25, 2016 7:34 pm
irvanovich says:
JoHoover says:
irvanovich says:
And that, ladies and gents, is how you intimidate someone...
If only it worked on more than 1 goblin...
Yeah, but that one goblin has it currently running down both legs.
He is pretty FUBAR at the moment.
Aug 25, 2016 8:39 pm
Yeah, the one-target aspect of it seems weird... That was a call that I hated making (based on the natural 20, it may still have an effect ;)
Aug 25, 2016 10:54 pm
We get thirty feet of movement (6 squares) per action, right? (And you can't move diagonally?) So if I wanted to get to G8, I would have to move twice and then attack once?
Aug 25, 2016 10:55 pm
thedandyman says:
We get thirty feet of movement (6 squares) per action, right? (And you can't move diagonally?) So if I wanted to get to G8, I would have to move twice and then attack once?
Correct!
Aug 25, 2016 10:58 pm
Naatkinson says:
thedandyman says:
We get thirty feet of movement (6 squares) per action, right? (And you can't move diagonally?) So if I wanted to get to G8, I would have to move twice and then attack once?
Correct!
With the exception of diagonals:
The first square you move through diagonally in a round costs one square, the next is two squares, the next is one, the next is two... so on and so on.
Aug 26, 2016 12:14 am
Well, you get 30 feet. Us little fellers only get 20
Aug 30, 2016 3:04 am
Urthask wants to charge, but needs a straight line to do it.
1. Can he leap onto the table and charge G1?

2. Is Arktos coming? He got a 15 on his Perception check to hear Urthask's whistle.
Last edited August 30, 2016 3:04 am
Aug 30, 2016 3:07 am
Jabes.plays.RPG says:
Urthask wants to charge, but needs a straight line to do it.
1. Can he leap onto the table and charge G1?

2. Is Arktos coming? He got a 15 on his Perception check to hear Urthask's whistle.
1. I'll allow you an Acrobatics check to attempt to leap up on top of the table and make your charge.

2. Arktos will be there next round :) He had a bit of a hard time squeezing his way through the door!
Aug 30, 2016 3:11 am
Yeah Arktos tends to have trouble with that LOL!
Aug 30, 2016 3:14 am
OUCHIE!

What now? Does that end my turn?
Last edited August 30, 2016 3:15 am
Aug 30, 2016 3:15 am
Jabes.plays.RPG says:
OUCHIE!

What now? Dies that end my turn?
No, it will just consume one of your actions for the round.

On a related note, how would everyone feel if we switched back to regular action economy? I'll go with the consensus here.
Aug 30, 2016 3:28 am
Not knowing enough, I can't gauge which is the best way to go. As a caster, I only expect two actions, so I think it's up to others.
Aug 30, 2016 3:28 am
Wow, Urthask has lost it!

About the unchained action economy: I was kinda liking it because it was simpler though I understand it has its drawbacks. I'm ok either way.
Aug 30, 2016 4:36 am
This is my first pathfinder game so I don't have a point of reference for the regular system. I'm fine with either.
Aug 30, 2016 4:55 am
Naatkinson says:
OOC:
Only the first attack action you take will get to attack with both weapons, the others are one at a time until you get the higher ranks of the Two-Weapon Fighting feat chain :)

I'll resolve these actions in the morning
Ok, Sorry. Really thought I had it right this time. So you can disregard the whip trip attack though I doubt I hit anything anyways.
load next

You do not have permission to post in this thread.