Open Chat

load previous
Apr 20, 2025 4:02 am
I was told not to extend traits to more than +5 with Transformation! D=
Quote
Apr 20, 2025 5:10 am
I think I just realised that one of the attack Perks I planned on using is of dubious utility:
Reach says:

Reach (+5) Your attack has extensive
reach that makes it difficult to engage you
in combat. Perhaps you wield a hefty pole-
arm, strike with immense claws, or just
have one hell of a swing. The recipient of
this attack, even if it misses, must choose
a –1 Penalty to either their Attack or their
Defense Rolls against you until your next
turn. This Perk may be taken multiple
times; for each time it is taken, increase
the Penalty by one.
The reason it is dubious is that it penalises attack/defence against me (no mention of my allies), but I cannot ever take two attacks against the same target in one turn, and the next time I get to attack, it's my next turn and the effect wears off until it began. So the target can just choose a penalty to defence against me and nothing bad would happen whatsoever.
Last edited April 20, 2025 8:37 am
Quote
Apr 20, 2025 6:28 am
Yeah, Reach is...pointlessly bad that way.

Anyway, sorry again for the late and short posts. My grandmother fell and hit her head today so I was in the hospital ER with her most of the day. She's fine -shaken of course- but they did all kinds of scans and tests to make sure.
Quote
Apr 20, 2025 9:32 am
Hugs.

In light of this realisation about Reach, I'm thinking it should be thrown away in favour of other techniques.

Which reminds me of a question I had, @Moyreau: how are we handling Countering? It's supposed to be declared before the dice hit the table, but given the nature of PbPs, we all of course post the roll together with the action description.
Quote
Apr 21, 2025 3:00 am
Okok...

Sorry about the Transformation confusion. In my defense, there's almost half a year since I said that! Uh... Sorry...

About the reach attack. Well, the bonus apply to the attack itself which uses reach, and the next attack she mades on her next turn, I presume? of course, most targets will pick the defense penalty instead, I'd presume.
Oh, I never thought about that. I presume that one could ask for a counter, where the attacker would reroll their attack? You should experiment with that.
Quote
Apr 21, 2025 4:50 am
Moyreau says:
Okok...

Sorry about the Transformation confusion. In my defense, there's almost half a year since I said that! Uh... Sorry...
So . . . uh, which one is it, and does buying it after character creation change the answer? (Note: I bought it recently; also, I think I just used the bonus dice from the transformation for the attack, exceeding the +5 cap as a result.)
Moyreau says:
About the reach attack. Well, the bonus apply to the attack itself which uses reach, and the next attack she mades on her next turn, I presume? of course, most targets will pick the defense penalty instead, I'd presume.
To the attack itself? Are you sure that's right?

Oh and now I realised its attack bonus also only applies against me. Interesting. If you're sure about it applying both to the current attack and the next one, that does give it a major role, albeit more of a duelist's one. So . . . please confirm whether I understood your interpretation correctly.
Moyreau says:
Oh, I never thought about that. I presume that one could ask for a counter, where the attacker would reroll their attack? You should experiment with that.
Ah, so the attacker re-rolls when the defender declares a Counter? Yeah, that could work. I might try that out in the foreseeable future then.
Quote
Apr 21, 2025 1:48 pm
Oh, if she just bought the transformation, the cap wouldn't apply, as it only serves in chargen, as I stated.
Quote:
Oh and now I realised its attack bonus also only applies against me.
What do you mean by that?
Quote
Apr 21, 2025 1:51 pm
Oh, if she just bought the transformation, the cap wouldn't apply, as it only serves in chargen, as I stated.
Quote:
Oh and now I realised its attack bonus also only applies against me.
What do you mean by that?

And ok, I think that it applying on the attack itself makes little sense.

On that matter though, this perk could be way more useful combined with Area Attack, giving the penalty to multiple enemies.
Quote
Apr 21, 2025 2:15 pm
Moyreau says:
Oh, if she just bought the transformation, the cap wouldn't apply, as it only serves in chargen, as I stated.
vicky_molokh says:
Oh and now I realised its attack bonus also only applies against me.
What do you mean by that?

And ok, I think that it applying on the attack itself makes little sense.

On that matter though, this perk could be way more useful combined with Area Attack, giving the penalty to multiple enemies.
I mean that as written the penalty only applies if the enemy decides to attack Lín Jìng or defend against Lín Jìng, not against anyone else.
Reach says:

Reach (+5) Your attack has extensive
reach that makes it difficult to engage you
in combat. Perhaps you wield a hefty pole-
arm, strike with immense claws, or just
have one hell of a swing. The recipient of
this attack, even if it misses
, must choose
a –1 Penalty to either their Attack or their
Defense Rolls against you until your next
turn
. This Perk may be taken multiple
times; for each time it is taken, increase
the Penalty by one.
Of the three underlined sections:
Part 1 seems to mean that this begins applying after the attack is fully resolved (regardless of the outcome), Which you confirmed (' I think that it applying on the attack itself makes little sense').
Part 2 means that it only applies to attacks and defences made against the one who performed the Reach Attack.
Part 3 is written to mean that it only applies until the Reach Attacker's next turn, which combined with part 2 would make it very dubious. But you wrote that it applies up to and including the next Attack (which would have to normally happen on Lín Jìng's next turn).

Which of the three parts are true (and for which of those my reading is correct) significantly influences the utility of the perk and when it's good to use.

Do I understand correctly that parts 1 and 2 are correct, but you decided to override the interpretation of point 3, enabling its applicability on the next Attack by the original Reach Attacker?
Quote
Apr 21, 2025 2:32 pm
Well, presuming that there would be any kind of threat for picking the defense penalty, it's safe to assume that the attacker would have at least a single opportunity of attacking when the perk's effects are still on. So I'd take it that happens on his next turn. Since you can't attack the same target more than once in a turn (not even with multiple actions), it's safe to say that you could still attack on your next turn with the defense penalty.

Or, of course, using it before countering.
Quote
Apr 22, 2025 3:04 pm
Hibana seems to be conveniently ignoring the hundred-years part of Hanami’s curse. And the curse part.

Well, she’s trying to support Sumeryu’s claim, and this is what she has to work with.
Quote
Apr 22, 2025 4:17 pm
Hibana helps adorably!
Quote
Apr 22, 2025 6:20 pm
That’s the goal.

By the way, I hope your grandmother is feeling better, @BlondeDragonGenie . I noticed the post about that the other day.
Quote
Apr 22, 2025 7:36 pm
Thank you. As it turned out, all she got was some cuts and bruises. But they still took CT and X-ray scans and so forth. It took most of the day. Thankfully, there's no major damage.
Quote
Apr 25, 2025 12:48 am
Hello everyone. It is with great sorrow that I must announce I can no longer run this game, however fun it have been.

I am grateful for everyone that decided to invest their times with this game, and hope you have found it worthwhile. This I say specially to Legendary_Sidekick, who came about just recently.

I don't plan to run or play any games for the foreseeable future, but who knows, we may meet again.
Quote
Apr 25, 2025 12:58 am
That's unfortunate and sudden, though I won't pry. I know life can get busy or rough >.>

Good luck with whatever you're doing next. Same for everyone else who stuck around too. I had fun doing this at least!
Quote
Apr 25, 2025 1:55 am
I hope everything works out for you all.
Quote
Apr 25, 2025 2:22 am
I had a blast! Sorry you need to end it, though I’m sure you have an irl reason. Whatever it is, I wish you well, @Moyreau .

Thank you for running this.
Quote
Apr 25, 2025 4:12 am
That's too bad ot was very fun playing with all of you! Thank you for running this Moyreau and I wish everyone here well and hope we may meet again!
Quote
Apr 25, 2025 6:31 am
It was rather fun while it lasted, but real life happens to everyone. If the circumstances change, I hope this campaign resumes.
Quote
load next

You do not have permission to post in this thread.